|
|
Has DITA jumped the shark?
By Larry Kunz posted on January 19, 2010 13:00
Last week a commenter on another blog asserted that DITA has "jumped the shark." It's not a new idea. I've heard other people say that DITA has already seen its best days, that it's struggling to remain relevant in a world that's passed it by. I was amused, I admit, because it was the first time I'd seen DITA compared to a TV show.
Still, it was a serious statement and it merits a serious response.
While it's true that DITA is sometimes overhyped, here's why I think it has a long and bright future.
One of the most talked-about technical communication trends for the 2010s is community-based content: the realization that content comes from all over the enterprise, not just from the technical writing department, and from outside the enterprise (customers and end users) as well.
But all of this community-based content needs to be organized and formatted it in a consistent, usable way. DITA is great for this because it's based on XML. Content can be tagged for the semantic Web, and formatting styles can be applied without modifying the content itself.
While the industry hasn't settled on a good DITA-wiki combination, it's likely that one will emerge. Such a tool will make it practical for everyone to contribute content, whether or not they know a specific text editor or text processor, and for the content to be formatted in a consistent fashion according to the enterprise's requirements.
Moreover, DITA is a great fit for another hot trend: Agile software development. With DITA, a documentation team can generate review drafts more easily because the review is based on a few topics rather than on a whole document. The team can also respond readily to plan changes, because the topics are built for reuse and can be moved around and reassembled as needed.
Finally, DITA is a standard. It can grow in whatever directions the community wants to take it.
So, no. DITA hasn't jumped the shark, and in fact it's well positioned to flourish in the 2010s.
Recent Related Articles:
To key or not to key -
I apologize, William, but I really couldn't resist that pun.
I've spent some time over the last week or so thinking about keys and the keyr...
Converting to DITA: It's about people -
Several years ago I belonged to a team that wrote documentation for business software. We produced PDFs and help systems, using well-known tools to de...
Is DITA good enough? -
Those of you who know me, know that I'm a very staunch proponent of DITA. In fact, a recent contract I worked that had me work in Word convinced ...
Welcome to the major leagues -
Later today, if things go according to plan, 21-year old Stephen Strasburg will pitch in his first major-league baseball game. Baseball fans have anti...
The party has already begun (user-generated content) -
Imagine this: You're organizing a big party. You've reserved a nice banquet room and you're setting up tables with white tablecloths, place cards, ste...
Comments:
Adam
Tuesday, January 19, 2010 9:21 PM
Nice article, Larry. I was especially thankful for being introduced to the phrase "jumped the shark." Have I been living under a rock? In any event, I'm very excited that Google searches on Charles Darwin, Arthur Fonzarelli, the Beagle, and/or the Fonz will likely lead to this very blog from now on. ;o) Can you expand a bit on why you think community-based content needs to be organized and formatted in a consistent, usable way? I don't really doubt the statement, but then again, some examples might help. I think I'm looking for a tad more specificity around the words "organized" and "formatted." Also, my readerly ears pricked up a bit upon hearing the phrase "DITA-wiki combination." In such a combination, what exactly are you envisioning in terms of tools and/or processes? And what role might a "technical writer" have in relation to this combination?
Tuesday, January 19, 2010 9:27 PM
Hi Larry, I think this is the problem. If it was a product, developed by a company with a financial incentive to make it work, you’d have greater adoption. But, as it’s ‘just’ a standard, then no-one really owns it. Forgive my ignorance here, but is DITA embraced by Adobe into its Adobe FrameMaker products? I have no idea – just curious to know who’s adopted & championed it. Ivan
Larry Kunz
Wednesday, January 20, 2010 3:18 PM
Adam, thanks for your comment. I don't think that community-based content can simply be placed on the web in the same format it was received, like a free-expression wall. It needs to be easy to find and easy to use. Accordingly, there needs to be a curator who organizes the incoming content into, say, a knowledge base or a list of FAQs, and who also performs at least low-level copyediting -- fixing terminology, removing inappropriate and duplicate content, etc. Re "DITA-wiki combination": Wikis are evolving as a popular way of gathering content from the community. But tools are needed that can take content from wikis and, in the hands of the content curator, massage that content into DITA topics (or at least DITA-like topics) that can be reused and can be output to a variety of formats. The "technical writer," as you might've guessed, is the curator.
Larry Kunz
Wednesday, January 20, 2010 3:59 PM
Ivan, you're right when you say that DITA will have greater adoption if it's embraced by the software vendors. The good news is, this is already happening. You mentioned FrameMaker, which has been DITA-compliant since version 8. While Adobe might not have "embraced" DITA with a whole-hearted DITA-Frame integration, it's at least shown a willingness to shake hands. Eliot Kimber (Dr. Macro) recently posted this list of other commercial DITA-aware editors on the dita-users Yahoo group: - Arbortext Editor (www.arbortext.com) - OxygenXML (www.oxygenxml.com) - Syntext Serna (www.syntex.com) - XMetal Author (www.xmetal.com) Additionally, can tell you that... - XMetal, in addition to the editor, has a pretty slick DITA-based reviewing tool called Reviewer. - Madcap (www.madcapsoftware.com) is supporting DITA with its Blaze and Flare products. - Bluestream's XDoc (www.bluestream.com) provides a DITA-compliant CMS. - Quark (dynamicpublishing.quark.com) has a DITA plugin for Word--just the thing for capturing content from SMEs who might shy away from a structured-authoring setup. All in all, the trend is clear. An increasing number of commercial vendors are seeing that there's a market for DITA-compliant tools. And several of the tools are going way beyond simple DITA-compliance to full-blown integration with DITA.
Wednesday, January 20, 2010 7:38 PM
Madcap do some great work. Must see what they're up to here.
|